Why I Allow Corrections on Student Work

Although many of my educational philosophies are unique (and often unpopular, though not without sound research to back them up), this one is a bit more mainstream: corrections. Most teachers I know and have worked with allow corrections of some sort in at least some capacity. My version is broader than most, though, but here’s why.

First of all, if you don’t allow corrections on assignments (any assignments: homework, classwork, tests, quizzes, etc.), think about why you don’t. I (and the other teachers who do this) allow corrections because it facilitates learning. What good is it to get something wrong if you don’t figure out why and correct it? Failing a test doesn’t teach a student anything. It shows, in fact, that the student needs more instruction. This goes for every assignment. By not allowing corrections, or some form of redoing the work, whether it’s the original assignment or an alternate assignment, it devalues the assignment itself and the skill it’s assessing.

Let’s say you either already allow corrections, or want to, or I’ve now convinced you to, but you’re not sure how best to implement this policy. Many teachers I know only allow corrections on homework, or only on tests, or some restriction regarding the assignment. I, however, allow corrections on everything. Why? See the preceding paragraph. I don’t assign busy work, and I find that corrections give an assignment value. It also improves students’ self-image and motivation to know that a failing grade need not be permanent.

So, now you’ve decided to allow your students to correct all assignments. How do you grade those corrections? Many teachers I know only allow students to correct work that scores below a certain score. Some set it at the failing mark. Some set it at a “C.” I, however, allow students to correct anything that isn’t a 100%. Why? Because failure means different things to different people. For some, a 50% is failing, but a 75% is awesome. For others, an 85% is failing and a 95% is acceptable. I don’t think it’s fair to tell students what their expectations for themselves should be. If I want to let students correct failed assignments, I should honor each student’s definition of “fail.” Not to mention, this helps a LOT when a parent’s definition of “fail” doesn’t match the student’s. If you haven’t gotten the, “My student ONLY has a 97%, how can s/he raise it?” phone call…you will. Just wait. If you allow students to correct ALL assignments no matter the grade, you have that in your pocket when a parent questions a student’s grade. Then it becomes their job to monitor the student taking advantage of all opportunities to improve his/her grade, and not yours.

Now for the actual grading part. The majority of teachers I know who allow corrections count them as half credit. I’m not completely against this school of thought, but I would like to offer what I do as a counter. I give full credit for all corrections on any assignment that isn’t an assessment. So, all classwork, homework, etc. can be corrected until a student’s score is 100%. Why do I do that? Two simple reasons: it demonstrates that the assignment and the skill have value, and it is a CYA for failing students when parents or administration question a student’s grades. You might think that it would discourage students from trying their best the first time around. And yes, while this does happen with some students, by and large, the majority of students don’t use this policy as an excuse to slack off. As with most of my policies (see my entries on open-notes testing and accepting late work), I find that this helps the students who have extremely high standards for themselves and it also helps the students who are truly struggling but really want to improve. The super lazy kids are going to be lazy, no matter how many avenues to success they have available. But everyone else really benefits from these policies and they don’t use them as excuses to give less than their best.

The exception to my full credit for corrections policy is assessments. I allow students to correct assessments, but only for half credit. This is akin to the more common practice of allowing a student to retake a test or take an alternate version of the test and averaging the scores. I prefer to use my time in other ways, so I don’t make multiple versions of assessments. Instead, I encourage students to correct the assessment they took, but receive half credit for the correction. It serves the same purpose as the full-credit corrections of the other assignments but does prevent what would rapidly become a pervasive problem of half-assing it (as it were) the first time around.

You’ve decided to give allowing corrections a try! Great! Now, I’ll save you some trial and error for what works best (or at least better). Some tips for allowing corrections:

  • Let students do the corrections on their own time. Don’t do them together in class, and don’t set aside specific class time to allow corrections. Make students make corrections a priority in their own lives.
  • Only accept corrections that are done in pen (or a different color pen if the original assignment was done in pen). This saves you SOOO much time from having to hunt to find the correction. If you’re worried about space, this can be achieved by requiring students to submit their corrections on a separate piece of paper with the original assessment.
  • Require students to leave their original answers. You, as the teacher, want to see that the student has corrected the error. If the student erases the original answer, that progress is lost.

If you have any other tips, please share them!



I was fortunate enough to be awarded grant funding to stock my classroom with a full set of kid tablets. My intention is to be a 1:1 classroom this year and put this technology to good use. I wasn’t entirely sure what I was going to do with these tablets, other than maybe allow students time to play on educational apps when they’d finished their work, but then I found an incredible online tool in the form of Deck.Toys. For those of you who read my Smoothboard post, Deck.Toys has the same creator, BoonJin. This platform allows teachers to create maps for students to work their way through – a bit like a treasure map with stopping points along the way. These decks can be as minimal or as thorough as you’d like. I put together an entire unit on one of mine. You can upload PowerPoints, videos, graphics, and even link to outside sites. There are also cool interactive “apps” you can put into your decks to give students practice on things like vocabulary, problem solving, etc. Some of these apps are even interactive, so students work together instead of being tied to the device for the whole time.

Sounds cool, right? It is. And I haven’t even told you about what I think is the best part: the data. The platform saves the student data so you can analyze it. Every slide the students go through records their responses and/or scores. You can build in quizzes or even have an app serve as a quiz. The deck scores it and then keeps that data for you to use and analyze. So. Cool.

The platform is free, but the free version is somewhat limited. The upgraded version isn’t too pricey, and it’s totally worth it (especially since many teachers may find that their department budget will cover the annual fee, or even the PTA, if you’re a member, will sometimes grant teachers small grants to do things like this).

BoonJin is still working on developing different aspects of the platform. He’s very receptive to ideas and suggestions, and answers questions promptly. There is a learning curve, though, but investing the time is worth it, to give your students an interactive, engaging experience.

Oh, and one more thing…once you’ve created your deck, you can sell them. Yep, that’s right. You can charge other teachers to use your deck. Or you can make your deck public and free. There are many free decks you can access without even having to make your own! Could this tool get any cooler?!

Smoothboard Air

As I embarked on my search to free myself from the front of the classroom, I stumbled upon (thanks to my brother, who teaches English in Japan – shout out to Eric) an interface called Smoothboard. Developed by BoonJin, it’s a way to use the wifi connection between two devices with wifi capability to remotely control the master device. That doesn’t make much sense, so let me explain. In my classroom, I have a laptop set up on my AV table with my ELMO and projector. As great as all that technology is, writing on the board, working with the ELMO, or working from my laptop tethers me to the front of the room. Students are very difficult to manage from that far away. Any teacher worth his/her weight in salt knows that proximity control is the first line of defense against misbehavior. Kids do what they think they can get away with, right? I mean, most of them, anyway. So, there’s this seemingly dichotomous issue where I have to be near my students but also up in the front of the room teaching. Sure, not 100% of the time. There are circulation points built into the lesson when students do partner or independent work. I don’t want any of my readers to think that I just park my behind up in a chair at the table and talk, a la Peanuts teacher, for a whole period. But it is limiting to have to go back up to the front to work out an example, give a visual to answer a question, etc.

Enter the Smoothboard interface. First, I download the Smoothboard software (free, though you can pay to remove “ads”) onto my laptop. Then, I can take my tablet, smartphone, Surface, etc. and activate the Smoothboard interface so that my personal device (the tablet, etc.) controls my laptop. The interface also has the cool capability to use drawing tools, has graph paper, and other awesome features that let me teach from anywhere in the room. I can go over bell work, do examples, write whole essays, even, from my tablet right next to Johnny in the back of the room, who now is deterred from being his usually obnoxious self.

Look! I made a video!


How to Gain an Extra Set of Hands in Your Classroom

As a teacher, if I could give myself a superpower, it would probably be the ability to be in two places at the same time. That, or just never need sleep. Or be able to stop time. But definitely, being able to be in two places at once would be an amazing ability – especially in my own classroom as I teach.

I also wish I could re-teach every lesson for students who were absent. There’s no time for that, but it would make life so much easier if I could take the student aside when s/he returned and give the lesson from the day before.

Well, two years ago, I got myself one step closer to achieving both those dreams. How, you ask? I’ll let you in on my secret: I videotaped myself teaching the lesson. Sometimes I did this before the lesson, and sometimes I did it during first period so I had it for the rest of the day. Then, I played the video and I was able to teach the lesson and walk around the room and troubleshoot (and manage behavior) without affecting pacing. I also put the videos up online for students who were absent, so they could watch the lesson and get the same instruction as their peers who had been in class. It was, I suppose, a variation of the flipped classroom.

I’ve not perfected the art of the video. I’m still learning new things. Just the other week, in fact, I learned that you can record your computer screen while talking as a function in PowerPoint (cool, I know, right?!). And, I figured out how to use a graphic tablet (very affordable on Amazon) to do real-time notes and handwritten lessons through PowerPoint’s “Mix” function. So, I’m still learning. But it’s made an AMAZING difference in my teaching and my students’ learning. It takes some prep work and time in the beginning, but it is SO worth it in the end. Have you ever done something like this? If so, what are some tips and tricks you can share to make it more successful? Thanks!

Why I allow open-notes quizzes and tests

Every teacher has his or her own educational philosophies and teaching style. One of the things I’ve learned throughout my teaching career is that while good teachers learn from others and take bits and pieces from others to incorporate into their own classes, you can’t be another teacher. No two teachers are exactly alike, and trying to be a carbon copy of another teacher, no matter how incredible that teacher may be, isn’t going to be as effective as developing your own personal teaching style.

That being said, I learned a long time ago that I espouse some unique philosophies on education and teaching, and I run my classroom differently from most teachers I know. Which is fine. I would NEVER try to tell another teacher how to teach. I do not like it when others do that to me, so I don’t do it to them. Suggestions and tips are fine, but I shy away from saying things like, “You have to…,” or “You should…” Instead, if I notice a teacher is struggling or having a certain issue, I share with them, “What works for me is…” and let them adapt it for their own classroom.

If you read my blog regularly, you’re probably already aware of this: I assign seats in secondary classrooms. I don’t allow backpacks at desks. I grade through growth and gains. I accept late work. I rarely assign homework. I allow corrections. Many teachers disagree with my teaching style because that’s not what works for them. And that’s okay, as long as they don’t try to force me to do what works them.

In this vein, I offer another perspective that I have found to be quite rare in my educational experience: open-notes assessments. I’m not talking about a few here or there, I’m talking about every single classroom assessment being open book and open notes.

I can hear it now: “You must be joking!” But I’m not. Much like my philosophy on assigning homework, my perspective on assessments has evolved over the years. Here are the top five reasons why I now only give open-notes assessments:

  • It encourages consistent and high-quality note-taking skills. If my students know they will be able to use their notes on an assessment, they work harder in class to pay attention and write neatly so they can use them effectively later. Yes, they should be using them to study, but allowing them to use notes on an assessment provides another incentive to be on task and pay attention to detail.
  • It provides support for me when parents or administration questions a student’s grades. Much like my reasons for accepting late work, I find many arguments silenced when I tell a parent or an administrator that students are welcome to use their notes, and if they aren’t passing my assessments, it’s likely because they’re goofing off in class rather than writing down the key information.
  • Assessments should be authentic. Again, much like my decisions behind the assigning homework issue, I’ve really come to think critically about what purpose my assessments serve. I used to give assessments that were focused on rote memory skills. Could a student memorize a definition? Could a student memorize a formula? They didn’t focus very much on actual problem-solving skills or application. I realized I wanted to be more interested in whether or not my students understood the material. Had they internalized it? Could they render it useful in a given circumstance? I thought about how in the real world, if a student needed to find the circumference of a circle or develop a subplot in a story they wrote, it wouldn’t be in isolation. They would have access to and use various resources to find what they needed, and then use their knowledge of the concept to apply it. So I allow open-notes assessments because memorizing rote facts isn’t authentic.
  • Piggybacking on this idea is that both my teaching and my assessments are of higher quality because I allow students to use their notes. I have to carefully design my assessments so they don’t have problems that are too similar to what was given in the notes. I have to make sure that they present opportunities for students to apply what they’ve learned and not just copy from what was shown in class. I have to be more creative and have more depth in my instruction and my assessments.
  • Because of this, I’ve found that allowing students to use their notes on assessments honestly doesn’t make that big of a difference in their grades. Aside from a few formulas that they have access to, being able to use their notes doesn’t change the outcome by much for students. If a student truly understands the concept, takes conscientious notes, and studies, s/he’s going to succeed on the assessment, whether s/he has access to the notes or not. If a student doesn’t understand the concept, or didn’t take good notes, or didn’t study, s/he’s not going to succeed on the assessment – and having access to notes isn’t going to change that. The previous 4 benefits still make it worthwhile, though, so I continue to allow open-notes assessments.

“But wait!” Some may shout, “What about the state tests? Students can’t use notes on those!”

I’m aware of that, and I remind students of that at every turn. Most states, however, give formula sheets on the math assessments, which reinforces the idea of authenticity. I have found, though, that on state assessments, my students consistently perform at or above the level of my colleagues who do not give open-notes assessments, which negates this argument.

Is there a right or wrong philosophy here? No. As is true with nearly all aspects of teaching, it’s about finding what works for you and your students and running with it.

My Newest CIM: RL.7.3

For those of you who read regularly, you’ll remember that I’m working on my 7th grade line of Continuous Improvement Model mini-lesson resources. I’m making good progress and I have recently finished and posted the CCSS.ELA.RL.7.3 resource. With this, I’ve also made a bundle with RL.7.1, RL.7.2, and RL.7.3, so you can save over 15% if you are interested in all 3.

What is a CIM? The acronym “CIM” stands for “Continuous Improvement Model.” It is one name for the research-based strategy that follows the “I do,” “we do,” “you do,” teaching model. In this resource, there are 3 lessons. Lesson 1 is a teacher-modeled lesson. Lesson 2 is a collaborative lesson where the teacher leads the class. The students complete lesson 3 independently. This resource is, in and of itself, a scaffolding tool. It is designed to help students master standards in a gradual manner.

This product is a 3-5 day tool for teachers to instruct, assess, and reteach skills and concepts associated with the RL.7.3 standard: Analyze how particular elements of a story or drama interact (e.g., how setting shapes the characters or plot). It also aligns with Florida’s standard: LAFS.7.RL.1.3, because of how Florida adapted their standards. It may also align with your state’s standards if your state doesn’t use CCSS.

The only Common Core practice I’ve been able to find is general and mixed-standards. Mine is the only one I know of that does individual standard, targeted instruction and practice. It’s low-prep and easy to implement. I use literature in the public domain from reputable authors (like Kipling, Twain, and Poe – this resource uses works by Hawthorne and Maupassant), so you’re exposing your students to quality literature with targeted standards practice. It takes out all the prep and guesswork!

If you’re looking for a quick, targeted, and easy resource for this standard, come check it out!

Football Freebie! 10/21/14

As the secondary ELA assessment coordinator for my school district (one of the ten largest in the country…I coordinate over 75 exams!), I have found that the transition from the old standards to the new CCSS (okay, so Florida has the LAFS…yes, the LAFS – but at the secondary level they’re all but identical to the CCSS) has been difficult for teachers in terms of understanding the types of questions they ask students and where those fall on the standards “spectrum,” if you will. In the old standards, students at the secondary level were responsible (largely) for questions asking them to make inferences, draw conclusions, identify devices, etc.

10-21-14 a

Old secondary questions.

Now, these teachers feel like they’re “not allowed” to ask those types of questions anymore, because they do not demonstrate mastery of the secondary standards – particularly the key ideas/details and craft/structure clusters (1-6). What I’ve been trying to impress upon them, however, is that they should still be asking those questions in class during discussions and in-class assessments. The difference is that they will not see those types of questions on the new state assessments (like PARCC, Smarter Balance, or FSA – for Florida).

10-21-14 b

New CCSS questions.

I found it extremely helpful (and teachers have agreed) to have a document where the standards are presented vertically. So instead of seeing all the standards for grade 5, standard RL 1 is on a single page and it goes from K-12, so a teacher can see where the question they’re asking falls on the spectrum.

10-21-14 c

Sample page from resource

I have found that the majority of the “old style” questions now hover in the grades 2-4 range. Additionally, there are certain grade levels that have very specific caveats (rhetoric, for example, makes an appearance in the upper grades, poetry is emphasized in middle school, etc.), and it is helpful to see where the more generic concepts fall – either prior to or beyond the year of focus. Therefore, I have put together a document for ELA teachers that vertically presents all the RL and RI standards. These are the CCSS (Florida teachers, Hillsborough County has a document for you already…you can search around for it or contact me directly and I can get it to you). I would ideally like to eventually have a document that includes the W, SL, and L standards, but I simply didn’t have time for that this week, and since the Reading standards are the most prevalent (from what I have found, anyway), I went with those. Please leave me feedback about 1) whether or not this document is helpful, 2) if it would be helpful to have the additional standards in a similar document, and 3) if something like this would be useful for the Math standards as well. Enjoy!

ccss vertical alignment

CCSS Vertical Alignment Resource